درحال بارگذاري...
جستجو
| ایمیل دوست | |
| نام شما | |
| ایمیل شما | |
| کد مقابل را وارد نمایید | |
این صفحه برای دوست شما با موفقیت ارسال شد.
1992 مرتبه مشاهده شده
ارزیابی قابلیتهای تصمیمگیری چند معیاره در پروژههای ساخت و ساز و صنعت
عبدالهی، آزاده Abdollahi, Azadeh
- شماره پایان نامه:51918
- کد دانشکده:51
- پديدآور: عبدالهی، آزاده
- عنوان:ارزیابی قابلیتهای تصمیمگیری چند معیاره در پروژههای ساخت و ساز و صنعت.
- نام دانشگاه/پژوهشگاه:صنعتی شریف
- سال اخذ مدرك:1397.
- نام دانشکده:مهندسی و علوم
- مقطع:کارشناسی ارشد
- گرایش:مهندسی صنایع- مدیریت مهندسی
- توصیف ظاهری:102ص.: جدول، نمودار، کتابنامه؛ چکیده به فارسی و انگلیسی
- یادداشت:متن به انگلیسی
- توصیفگر: تصمیم گیری چندمعیاره Multicriteria Decision Making
- توصیفگر: فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
- توصیفگر: روش تاپسیس Technique for Order-Perference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS)Method
- توصیفگر: پروژه های صنعت ساخت و ساز Construction Industry Projects
- استاد راهنما. حجی، علی رضا
-
محتواي کتاب
- مشاهده
- 1.pdf
- MS TEZ - Azadeh Abdollahi - 95253006 - EN.pdf
- Azadeh Abdolahi MS Tez-EN.docx
- Chapter I - General Investigation
- 1-1 Introduction
- 1-2 Problem statement
- 1-3 The importance of the topic of research
- 1-3-1 The importance and necessity of multi-criteria decision-making capabilities in selecting construction projects
- 1-3-2 The importance and necessity of multi-criteria decision-making capabilities in evaluating the outsourcing of the whole or part of the project to a contractor or other company.
- 1-3-3 The importance and necessity of multi-criteria decision-making capabilities Identify and prioritize the uncertainties and risks of construction Project
- 1-4 Research questions
- 1-5 Research objectives
- 1-6 Research area
- 1-7 Research Innovation
- 1-8 Summaries
- Chapter II - Literature and research background
- 2-1 Introduction
- The first part of the theoretical foundations
- 2-2 Strategic management
- 2-3 Strategic planning
- 2-4 Strategy and performance management
- 2-5 Objectives of the organization in strategic planning
- 2-6 Building industrialization
- 2-6-1 Competitive strategy
- 2-6-2 -Differences in the industrialization of building and industrial industries
- 2-6-3 Major differences in industrial production of buildings and other industrial products
- 2-6-4 Benefits of building industrialization
- 2-6-5 Comparison of manufacturing speed between traditional and industrial methods
- 2-7 Multi-criteria decision-making models
- 2-8 Research background
- Chapter III - Research Methodology
- In the last chapter, the theoretical and empirical foundations of the research were examined. In this chapter, the conceptual structure of the research method is described. For this purpose, firstly, the issues related to the used logical model are ex...
- 3-1 Introduction
- 3-2 Steps to conduct research
- 3-3 Research method
- 3-4 Summary
- Chapter IV - Analyzing the data
- 4-1 Results of the questionnaire
- 4-2 Ratings of causes
- 4-2-1 Fuzzy Dumble
- Table 4-3: The names of the criteria
- Table 4-4 : The verbal expressions used in research and their equivalent values
- Table 5-4: Average opinion of all experts
- Table 4-6: Normalized Matrix
- Table 4-7 : Total Matrix
- Table 4-8 : Importance and Impact of Criteria (Fuzzy Numbers)
- Table 4-9: The Importance and Impact of Criteria (Decreasing Numbers)
- Figure 4-1 : Relationships and importance of criteria
- 4-2-2 Fuzzy network analysis process
- Table 4-10: Fuzzy spectrum and corresponding verbal expression
- Table 4-11: Option names and their abbreviations
- Table 4 12: Random Indicators (RI)
- 4-2-2-1 Steps to gaining weight of components by analyzing fuzzy networks
- Table 4-13: Average paired comparison of delayed causes
- Table 4-14: Average pair comparisons to e
- Table 4-15: Average pair comparisons to e
- Table 4-16 : Average pair comparisons to c
- Table 4-17: Average pair comparisons to c
- Table 4-18: Average pair comparisons to d
- Table 4-19: Average comparison of d
- Table 4-20: Average pair comparisons to p
- Table 4-21: Average pair comparisons to p
- Table 4-22: Average pair comparisons to e1
- Table 4-23: Average pair comparisons to e2
- Table 4-24: Average pair comparisons to e3
- Table 4-25 : Average paired comparison with e5
- Table 4-26 : Average paired comparison with e6
- Table 4-28: Average pair comparisons relative to c1
- Table 4-29: Average pair comparisons to c5
- Table 4-30: Average pair comparisons to c6
- Table 4-31: Average pair comparisons relative to c7
- Table 4-32: Average pair comparisons to c10
- Table 4-33: Average pair comparisons to d2
- Table 4-34: Average comparison of d7
- Table 4-35: Average paired comparison p5
- Table 4-36: Average paired comparison p7
- Table 4-37: Average paired comparison p12
- Table 4-38: Special vector level 2 matrix versus level 1
- Table 4-39: Special vector level 2 matrix versus level 2
- Table 4-40: Special vector level 3 matrix versus level 2
- Table 4-41: Special matrix of level 3 surface versus level 3
- Table 4-43 : Ultimate Criterion Matrix for Criteria for Delay
- Figure 4-2: Ultimate Critical Charts Criteria over Delay Causes
- Table 4-44 : Ultimate Weights Matrix Sub criteria for the causes of delay
- Figure 4 3: Final weights diagram below the criteria for the causes of the delay
- Table 4-45 : Final Values Matrix of Options for Delay Causes
- Figure 4-4: Final Weight Chart Options over Delay Causes
- 4-2-1 Fuzzy Dumble
- 4-3 Summery
- Chapter V - Composition and suggestions
- References
- Chapter I - General Investigation
- Azadeh Abdolahi MS Tez-EN.docx
